Friday, September 16, 2022

My fiction: "The Law of Virginity Status"

Synopsis:

Those perception say non-virgins must help non-virgin due to "The Law of Virginity Status".  However, in Malaysia and Singapore, there are non-virgin women called Cheryl, Cally, Sally, Jesica, Kelly, Samantha, Angeline, Priscilla, Juliana, Michelle, June, Sadia, Wincci, Jacqueline, Angela, Deborah and many others refuse to help non-virgin woman, Grace due to they claim that Grace is not a virgin verbally without scientific proof, i.e. these women are full of nonsense and the leaders of rumour by simply telling a story and many people trust them.  

These women's perception, only virgins can be successful and non-virgins like them do not want to help non-virgin even though they are having more than 1 sex partner, i.e. a non-virgin for sure by not able to marry their 1st man in their life after losing their virginity.

A series of attack from these women and followers on GRACE by jeopardize her reputation and nearly "kill" her by pushing all their historic romance and health profile to GRACE.  These women are mental health patients cum non-virgin when the moment they marry their husband, yet, they want GRACE to become a mental health patient too by manipulating stupid medical doctors in psychiatry to listen to them by judging GRACE as a mental health patient without a scientific evaluation, so that GRACE can walk far from infinite wealth and abundance of happiness.  They want to replace GRACE to marry a billionaire by having the will to divorce their husband.

The Law of Virginity Status means virgin must help virgin; non-virgin must help non-virgin.  It is so simple!  Yet, many non-virgin women do not help non-virgin women due to public perception say those helping non-virgin must be non-virgin women.  Why do they need to lie?  Why are they not helping people while other people help them when they are having a dull and miserable life right after they are no longer having a virgin in status?  Why?

I'm Hui-Shin Wong, Wong Hui Shin or Shyan H. wong.

No comments: