Why am I a graduate endorsed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) even though I scored on 7 A's in my SPM and a Second Class Upper Honours degree graduate?

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is voted and granted as the best university, i.e. No. 1 among all universities worldwide in year 2021.

I was chosen by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as one of their endorsed graduates with scholarship in year 2003 because I am the best of the best in certain subjects, i.e. very difficult subjects by scoring 100% and leading the groups according to Professor Dr. Zainuldin Ahmad, a Ph.D. graduate of University of Cambridge.  To MIT, languages are very simple subjects and mostly people can score perfect with proper guides.  MIT chose me as their graduate without prejudice and they value my knowledge as a Buddhist who is talking about "DAO" Philosophy.

I have proven myself with an excellent thesis of a Master of Science Information Technology edorsed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA by submitting my thesis 5 months ahead the schedule in year 2004.  Bear in mind that all chosen graduates of MIT are the best of the best in certain subjects or all subjects. 

Due to many people who did not know me were not qualified to get scholarship to further their study, they were jealous on me because I am a 7 A's and Second Class Upper Bacelor of IT (HONS) in Software Engineering under NARID certified Multimedia University (MMU), Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia.  These people who were jealous on me have created so many dilemma, conflicts, miscommunications, communication broke down, public perceptions and individuals' perception to use a group of people who do not know how to THINK to attack me to ensure that I must be a failure in my life.  For your information, I can read, speak and write many languages in extremely well proficiently since I was a child until to date, yet, I did not qualify to obtain all A's in my SPM result.  I did not score my Malay Language, Chinese Language and Malay Language, yet, I was chosen by MIT to be their graduate mainly because I have the full and impressive track records in public speaking with medals and I am doing extremly good job by talking to strangers without any prejudice.  I was selected and chosen by MIT because I am an important asset for our country, Malaysia, the VISION 2020 a reality.   

Due to I am an ENTJ woman, i.e. a naturally born successful woman.  All the top universities around the world eye on me and train me accordingly.  They were surpised that why I can't score myself to qualify myself a Ph.D. graduate.  

Let me tell you WHY:

1. My supervisor, Professor Dr. Ho Chin Kuan asked me to leave and stop my Ph.D. study after he knew that I was a 7 A's in SPM and a Second Class Upper Bachelor of IT (HONS) Software Engineering in year January, 2015.  To him, only Straight A's and First Class Honours degree graduate worth to be given a scholarship to work on a Ph.D. or to be qualified to work on a Ph.D..  I do not see why should I do a Ph.D. without a scholarship and supportive environment even though I can use less than 1 month to submit my final thesis with new algorithms and theories now.  I never view other people's algorithms in my thesis topic, yet, my thesis was supposed to be done in year 2015 since I am definitely a genius.  

2. I can't get a job because they said I am still a Ph.D. candidate since year 2015 until now mainly because these people use this nonsense excuse to stop me to look for a job.  How can I be the best of the best can perform without money to BUY RM 3,000 meals daily?  I need that because I am injured.  I refused to see doctors because doctors in Malaysia and Singapore are mostly STUPID by giving wrong diagnosis in order for me to spend money again and again without telling me that what would be the syndromes of my sicknesses while they only ordered me to eat the medication while I am not sick at all.  To me, after I ate their medication, I felt sick, no energy, into obesity, can't speak good English, afraid of darkness and many other side effects.  I stopped my medication, I need to use RM 3000 daily to buy all my food so that I can be SMART and EFFICIENT again.  I need high protein, high calsium, high fat and many others nutrients and vitamins. 

To be continued.

I'm Hui-Shin Wong, Wong Hui Shin and Shyan H. Wong.       

Hui-Shin Wong's 2022 Q1 and Q2 Reading List

1. Law and Social Norms 

Posner, Eric

2. The Medicine Book: Big Ideas Simply Explained 

DK

3. The Complete Harvard Classics - ALL 71 Volumes:: The Five Foot Shelf & The Shelf of Fiction: The Famous Anthology of the Greatest Works of World Literature 

Benjamin Franklin, John Woolman, William Penn, Juan Valera, Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson, Alexander L. Kielland, Presbourg Press

4. The Republic (AmazonClassics Edition)

Plato, Benjamin Jowett

5. Varieties of Progressivism in America (Hoover Institution Press Publication)

Peter Berkowitz

6. Constitutional Conservatism (Hoover Institution Press publication ; Book 634)

Peter Berkowitz

7. Ethics

Aristotle

8. The Prince (AmazonClassics Edition)

Niccolò Machiavelli, William Kenaz Marriott

9. The Agatha Christie Collection

Agatha Christie

10. The Power of Your Subconscious Mind

Joseph Murphy

11. Beyond Good and Evil (AmazonClassics Edition)

Friedrich Nietzsche, Helen Zimmern

12. The Arabian Nights (AmazonClassics Edition)

Andrew Lang

13. Macbeth (AmazonClassics Edition)

William Shakespeare

14. The Time Machine (AmazonClassics Edition)

H. G. Wells

15. The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes

Arthur Conan Doyle

16. The Limits of International Law

Jack L. Goldsmith, Eric A. Posner

17. Plato: The Complete Works

Plato

18. Principles of Mechanics: Fundamental University Physics (Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation)

Salma Alrasheed

19. Financial Times - UK Edition

The Financial Times Limited

20. Lectures on the Philosophy of Mathematics

Joel David Hamkins

2022 Herbert W. Vaughan Memorial Lecture in Harvard Law School Invited Guest Lecturer, Dr. Peter Berkowitz!

"Dr. Peter Berkowitz, the Tad and Diane Taube Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, delivered the 2022 Vaughan Lecture titled “Reflections on the Commission on Unalienable Rights.” The event was moderated by Jack Goldsmith, Learned Hand Professor of Law, Harvard Law School." ~https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxmeVr1jiok

About Peter Berkowitz:

1. Personal Website: http://www.peterberkowitz.com/

2. A long list of books are selling hot on Amazon.com:

• Nietzsche: The Ethics of an Immoralist (Harvard University Press, 1995).
• Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism (Princeton University Press, 1999).
• Never a Matter of Indifference: Sustaining Virtue in a Free Republic, editor (Hoover Institution Press, 2003).
• Varieties of Conservatism in America, editor (Hoover Institution Press, 2004).
• Varieties of Progressivism in America, editor (Hoover Institution Press, 2004)
• The Future of American Intelligence, editor (Hoover Institution Press, 2005)
• Terrorism, the Laws of War, and the Constitution: Debating the Enemy Combatant Cases, editor (Hoover Institution Press, 2005).
• Constitutional Conservatism: Liberty, Self-Government, and Political Moderation, (Hoover Institution Press, 2013).

Berkowitz has co-edited the Hoover Studies in Politics, Economics, and Society book series with Tod Lindberg since 2005.

3. Wikipedia Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Berkowitz 

Future of Free Speech

"Constitutional scholars and authors talked about the future of free speech in America. Topics included college campus censorship, defamation, Holocaust denial, the Supreme Court’s Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores case, and Internet hate speech." ~https://www.c-span.org/video/?318476-1/free-speech-us

Eric Posner, Professor of Chicago Law School; Book Author of "Law and Social Norms"

Stanley Fish, Cardozo Law Professor; Book Author of "There's No Such Thing as Free Speech"

Jefferey Rosen, National Constitution Center, President and CEO

Greg Lukianoff, Foundation of Individual Rights in Education, President; Book Author of "Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate"  

Jonathan Rauch, Brookings Institute, Senior Governance Studies Fellow

A Short Conversation About Human Right with Professor Jack Goldsmith from Harvard Law School

Someone claimed that he is a Professor from Harvard Law School, Jack Goldsmith called me right after I posted my criticism on a Singaporean, Julian Chan's work just before lunch today.  According to him, we must be heavily promoting Human Right.  We shouldn't limit people to certain philosophies because they have the human right to choose what they want to do in their life; no wrong and no right under the constitution of United States of America to be the champion of Human Right worldwide or internationally for more than 100 years.

"Hui-Shin, you should promote Human Right to promote free will of action from anyone who want to make a difference for a better world.  Don't limit others to follow your philosophy or business ethics since you are not appreciated by the way to educate her publicly!" said Professor Jack Goldsmith. 

"Noted!  I am practicing Freedom of Speech and Human Right from my perspective and investors' perceptive," I said.  

The Professor said, "I need to end the conversation.  It is late night here in United States of America."

I said, "OK!"

You are welcome to buy all Professor Jack Goldsmith's books and my books.

I'm Hui-Shin Wong, Wong Hui Shin or Shyan H. Wong.  

Are you "FAIR" and a great supporter of "JUSTICE"?

We must be "FAIR" or in other words, we must be a great supporter of "JUSTICE". We shouldn't justify our attitude towards one through his/ her social status or occupation. You must justify one by his/ her lifelong goal and what he/ she has been doing as the reflection of his/ her lifelong goal since copying a lifelong goal only buying a magazine, reading it and copying the idea; this is so simple! Hence, their action must be noted with detailed observation after he/ she declared his/ her lifelong goal!

During one of my traveling trips, I met one lady who claimed that she is a University of Oxford graduate. I welcome her to Malaysia even though she claimed that she is a prostitute because I am not looking at her social status or occupation, yet, I am looking at her situation in detail by having a lot of questions using 6W1H (Why, What, Where, Who, Whom, Which and How) such as "Why do you want to become a prostitute?".

Buy my book, "Sunshine Little Kitchen" to know more in detail about this prostitute! To find out more, kindly browse my author page under Amazon dot com, https://www.amazon.com/Hui-Shin-Wong/e/B08WCP82HB. Of course, you can search my name "Hui-Shin Wong" in Google Play Books to buy my 10 English books.

Look at my GURU in "JUSTICE", "ETHICS" and many others, Professor Dr. Michael Sandel from Harvard University (https://scholar.harvard.edu/sandel/home) who is a graduate from University of Oxford!

I'm Hui-Shin Wong, Wong Hui Shin or Shyan H. Wong.

It is about my criticism on the work of a Singaporean, Juliana Chan as a PUBLISHER on her extremely self-fish attitude to list down "Asian Scientist 100"!

I tried to approach Juliana Chan (https://wikitia.com/wiki/Juliana_M._Chan) through Linkedin and Instagram about my goodwill to lead her a successful entrepreneurship, yet, she blocked me.  

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Education is started to elevate the community flourish to eliminate poverty.  In other words, STEM Education is to use to help poor students to get a better job after they are graduated after studying STEM.  These graduates can totally change their life from a poor to a decently good life after studying STEM just like Juliana Chan herself born and raised as a POOR.  

To me, as a Science Communicator in Juliana Chan's shoes, she should encourage more poor students to attend her talks and activities because her main purpose to me is to encourage more or all poor students to study Science or STEM definitely not putting her effort to find out all these Asian Scientist 100 and interviewed them by flying and spending money in the hotels and claimed the investors' money.  If she was/ is using her own money for this agenda, I or we will not stop her.  

Hope that she take note!  Also, her magazine publication with herself as the Editor-In-Chief as a shame of Cambridge and MIT because she did not know ROOT WORDS.

She is self-fish because she has her main agenda to reach the RICH and POWERFUL to expand her network while she has no intention to help the poor ever since the day she blocked me while I wanted to alert her about her mistake.  She is trying to project herself as a successful entrepreneur to encourage more poor Science students like her  to become an entrepreneur while NOT a successful SCIENTIST, then, how can she justify herself as a Science Communicator while doing business is her main agenda?  Why not just promote heavily to encourage poor students to study entrepreneurship?

In addition, she should illustrate how poor she was a a child and how STEM education has changed her life while not interviewed the Asian Scietist 100 by spending a lot of money in logistic, transportation and accomodation.  

I'm Hui-Shin Wong, Wong Hui Shin or Shyan H. Wong, a deserving Full Professor in University of Oxford.